Get in touch with Kitech Company
Melt Filtration Technology Comparison
Click each tab to see how three filtration approaches compare on the metrics that matter for your recycling line.
Operating Cost
Performance
Maintenance
| Cost Factor | Laser Disc (KLF) | Wire Mesh | Hydraulic Piston |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen/Filter Replacement Frequency | Every 3–6 months | Every 2–8 hours | Varies (mesh insert) |
| Replacement Cost per Event | 1 disc set (reusable 10–15×) | 1 screen pack (disposable) | 1 mesh insert |
| Operator Labor per Change | 0 min (automatic) | 15–30 min (manual) | ~5 min (PLC-initiated) |
| Transition Scrap per Change | 0 kg | 0.5–2 kg | Small purge volume |
| Production Downtime per Change | 0 min | 15–30 min | 1–3 min |
| Hydraulic Oil & Seal Costs | None (no hydraulics) | None (manual) or Low (slide-plate) | Medium (seals + oil + HPU) |
Verdict: Wire mesh has the lowest upfront cost but the highest annual operating expense due to frequent screen pack purchases and labor. Hydraulic piston systems reduce downtime but add hydraulic maintenance overhead. KLF laser disc filters deliver the lowest total cost of ownership for lines running 5,000+ hours per year.
| Performance Metric | Laser Disc (KLF) | Wire Mesh | Hydraulic Piston |
|---|---|---|---|
| Filtration Consistency | Constant — holes don’t deform | Degrades as mesh stretches | Depends on mesh condition |
| Max Working Pressure | 25 MPa | 10–20 MPa | 25–50 MPa |
| Filtration Area per Unit | 1,295–6,556 cm² | 50–200 cm² per cavity | 200–800 cm² per cavity |
| Throughput Range | 200–2,400 kg/h | Varies by extruder | Varies by model |
| Pressure Stability | Constant (continuous scraping) | Sawtooth (builds between changes) | Near-constant (backflush dips) |
| Melt Temperature Consistency | Stable (no interruptions) | Fluctuates during changes | Mostly stable |
| Contamination Tolerance | High (post-consumer waste) | Low to moderate | Moderate to high |
Verdict: Hydraulic piston systems win on maximum pressure rating (up to 50 MPa). KLF laser disc filters lead on filtration area, contamination tolerance, and pressure/temperature consistency. Wire mesh systems are limited by frequent interruptions and pressure instability.
| Maintenance Item | Laser Disc (KLF) | Wire Mesh | Hydraulic Piston |
|---|---|---|---|
| Routine Screen Maintenance | Vacuum oven cleaning (10–15 cycles per disc set) | Replace entire screen pack each time | Replace mesh insert periodically |
| Seals & Gaskets | No hydraulic seals | Slide-plate seals (if hydraulic type) | Hydraulic piston seals (scheduled replacement) |
| Moving Parts Complexity | Gearmotor + scraper (simple) | None (manual) or Hydraulic cylinder | Hydraulic cylinder + HPU + controls |
| Scraper/Blade Maintenance | Inspect every 4–8 weeks, replace as needed | N/A | N/A |
| Heater Bands | Standard maintenance | Standard maintenance | Standard maintenance |
| Spare Parts Inventory | Disc screens + scraper blades | Hundreds of screen packs | Mesh inserts + hydraulic seals + oil |
Verdict: KLF systems have the simplest mechanical design — no hydraulics, no disposable screen packs. Scraper blade inspection is the only KLF-specific maintenance item. Wire mesh systems require large spare parts inventory. Hydraulic systems add oil, seal, and HPU maintenance.
